FUNCTIONALLY IMPAIRED ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO BNT162B2 BOOSTER VACCINATION IN CVID IgG RESPONDERS.

BACKGROUND: While previous studies described the production of IgG-antibodies in a subgroup of CVID-patients following mRNA-vaccinations with bnt162b2 SARS-CoV2 (CVID responders), the functionality of these antibodies in terms of avidity as measured by the dissociation rate constant (kdis) and the antibody response to booster immunization has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: In CVID responders and healthy individuals the avidity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum-antibodies and their neutralization capacity as measured by surrogate virus neutralizing antibodies were analyzed in addition to IgG-, IgM- and IgA-antibody levels and the response of circulating follicular T-helper cells after a third vaccination with BNT162b2 SARS-CoV2 mRNA-vaccine. METHODS: Binding IgG, IgA and IgM serum levels were analyzed by ELISA in CVID-patients responding to the primary vaccination (CVID responders, n=10) and healthy controls (n=41). The binding-avidity of anti-spike antibodies was investigated using biolayer interferometry in combination with biotin-labelled receptor-binding-domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV2 spike-protein and streptavidin-labelled sensors. Antigen-specific recall T-cell responses were assessed by measuring activation-induced markers by flow cytometry. RESULTS: After the third vaccination with BNT162b2 IgG-, IgM and IgA-antibody levels, sVNT levels and antibody avidity were lower in CVID responders as compared to healthy. In contrast αSpike-avidity was comparable in CVID responders and healthy individuals following primary vaccination. Follicular T-helper cell response to booster vaccination in CVID-responders was significantly reduced when compared to healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: Impaired affinity-maturation during booster-response provides new insight into CVID pathophysiology.

Community consensus on core open science practices to monitor in biomedicine.

The state of open science needs to be monitored to track changes over time and identify areas to create interventions to drive improvements. In order to monitor open science practices, they first need to be well defined and operationalized. To reach consensus on what open science practices to monitor at biomedical research institutions, we conducted a modified 3-round Delphi study. Participants were research administrators, researchers, specialists in dedicated open science roles, and librarians. In rounds 1 and 2, participants completed an online survey evaluating a set of potential open science practices, and for round 3, we hosted two half-day virtual meetings to discuss and vote on items that had not reached consensus. Ultimately, participants reached consensus on 19 open science practices. This core set of open science practices will form the foundation for institutional dashboards and may also be of value for the development of policy, education, and interventions.

Use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with secondary antibody deficiency in daily practice: a European expert Q&A-based review.

INTRODUCTION: Secondary antibody deficiencies (SAD) are often a side effect of specific therapies that target B cells directly or affect the antibody response indirectly. Treatment of immunodeficiency by immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is well established in primary antibody deficiencies, although the evidence for its use in SAD is less well established. To fill the gap and provide opinion and advice for daily practice, a group of experts met to discuss current issues and share best practical experience. AREAS COVERED: A total of 16 questions were considered that covered use of a tailored approach, definition of severe infections, measurement of IgG levels and specific antibodies, indications for IgRT, dosage, monitoring, discontinuation of IgRT, and Covid-19. EXPERT OPINION: Key points for better management SID should include characterization of the immunological deficiency, determination of the severity and degree of impairment of antibody production, distinguish between primary and secondary deficiency, and design a tailored treatment protocol that should include dose, route, and frequency of Ig replacement. There remains the need to carry out well-designed clinical studies to develop clear guidelines for the use of IgRT in patients with SAD.

Antigen-Specific CD4+ T-Cell Activation in Primary Antibody Deficiency After BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination

Previous studies on immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) were inconclusive with respect to the ability of the patients to produce vaccine-specific IgG antibodies, while patients with milder forms of primary antibody deficiency such as immunoglobulin isotype deficiency or selective antibody deficiency have not been studied at all. In this study we examined antigen-specific activation of CXCR5-positive and CXCR5-negative CD4+ memory cells and also isotype-specific and functional antibody responses in patients with CVID as compared to other milder forms of primary antibody deficiency and healthy controls six weeks after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Expression of the activation markers CD25 and CD134 was examined by multi-color flow cytometry on CD4+ T cell subsets stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides, while in parallel IgG and IgA antibodies and surrogate virus neutralization antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured by ELISA. The results show that in CVID and patients with other milder forms of antibody deficiency normal IgG responses (titers of spike protein-specific IgG three times the detection limit or more) were associated with intact vaccine-specific activation of CXCR5-negative CD4+ memory T cells, despite defective activation of circulating T follicular helper cells. In contrast, CVID IgG nonresponders showed defective vaccine-specific and superantigen-induced activation of both CD4+T cell subsets. In conclusion, impaired TCR-mediated activation of CXCR5-negative CD4+ memory T cells following stimulation with vaccine antigen or superantigen identifies patients with primary antibody deficiency and impaired IgG responses after BNT162b2 vaccination.

[COVID-19 effects on the kidney]. / COVID-19-Auswirkungen auf die Niere.

Apart from pulmonary disease, acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent and most severe organ complications in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The SARS-CoV­2 virus has been detected in renal tissue. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before and on dialysis and specifically renal transplant patients represent a particularly vulnerable population. The increasing number of COVID-19 infected patients with renal involvement led to an evolving interest in the analysis of its pathophysiology, morphology and modes of virus detection in the kidney. Meanwhile, there are ample data from several autopsy and kidney biopsy studies that differ in the quantity of cases as well as in their quality. While the detection of SARS-CoV­2 RNA in the kidney leads to reproducible results, the use of electron microscopy for visualisation of the virus is difficult and currently critically discussed due to various artefacts. The exact contribution of indirect or direct effects on the kidney in COVID-19 are not yet known and are currently the focus of intensive research.

COVID-19 effects on the kidney.

Apart from pulmonary disease, acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent and most severe organ complications in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The SARS-CoV­2 virus has been detected in renal tissue. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before and on dialysis and specifically renal transplant patients represent a particularly vulnerable population. The increasing number of COVID-19 infected patients with renal involvement led to an evolving interest in the analysis of its pathophysiology, morphology and modes of virus detection in the kidney. Meanwhile, there are ample data from several autopsy and kidney biopsy studies that differ in the quantity of cases as well as in their quality. While the detection of SARS-CoV­2 RNA in the kidney leads to reproducible results, the use of electron microscopy for visualisation of the virus is difficult and currently critically discussed due to various artefacts. The exact contribution of indirect or direct effects on the kidney in COVID-19 are not yet known and are currently the focus of intensive research.